Your Ad Here
SOT Casino - SOT Erotic Services - SOT Arcade - FlashChat

Go Back   Super Off Topic Syndicate > General Discussion > News / Current Events
Register gXboxLive FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Your Ad Here
Reply
 
Share LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2008, 11:13 AM   2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
SOT Administrator
 
AMEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 345T C045t
Posts: 32,079
AMEX is on a distinguished road
Baby Vaccines, the new epidemic. What you need to know.

Quote:
Should I vaccinate my baby?

Should I vaccinate my baby? - CNN.com

Five years ago, Kathye Petters-Armitage's first child received the exact vaccinations on the exact schedule recommended by her pediatrician.

But when she gave birth to her second child, Petters-Armitage had a change of heart.

In the intervening two years, she'd read a lot about concerns that vaccines cause autism and decided to ask her pediatrician to give her new baby fewer shots spread out over a longer period of time.

"I wasn't a hundred percent convinced there was a link between autism and vaccines," said Petters-Armitage, of Santa Clarita, California. "But I didn't want to be one of those parents who found out the hard way."

Pediatricians say they've seen a dramatic increase in the number of parents who, like Petters-Armitage, want to make changes in the vaccine schedule set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and the American Academy of Pediatrics, a schedule once considered by many pediatricians to be sacred and largely immutable. Video Watch more on making decisions about your children's shots »

Many of these doctors say even though they might disagree with these parents, they are making changes.

"If a parent says no to an intervention, including a vaccination, I have to accept that," said Dr. Arthur Lavin, a pediatrician in Beachwood, Ohio, and associate clinical professor of pediatrics at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. "I share with them what I know, but ultimately, it's the parent's decision."

Dr. Kenneth Bock, a clinical instructor in the department of family medicine at Albany Medical College in New York, put it this way: "It shouldn't be my way or the highway. We can't say one size fits all. One size doesn't fit all."

In an article on CNN.com in March, two CDC doctors wrote, "Although some may call it a 'one size fits all' approach, the recommended vaccine schedule is flexible."

The following is a list of vaccine changes that parents have requested and that some pediatricians have agreed to make. It does not include a discussion of the pros and cons to each approach, or a discussion of whether vaccines and autism are even linked, but rather a list of some approaches being used by some pediatricians and parents.

1. Delaying the first hepatitis B shot

Currently, newborns receive hepatitis B shots before they're discharged from the hospital.

"I've never understood why we give this at birth," said Dr. Richard Frye, assistant professor of pediatrics and neurology at the University of Texas Medical Center at Houston.

Hepatitis B is spread by having sex with an infected partner, by sharing needles, by sharing razors or toothbrushes with an infected person or by contact with blood or open sores of an infected person.

"I don't know babies who have sex or share needles," said Dr. David Traver, a pediatrician in private practice in Foster City, California.

Lavin says that instead of giving the hepatitis B shot at birth, he routinely gives it when a baby is 2 months old.

One exception: If a mother carries hepatitis B, her baby must receive the vaccine and treatment for hepatitis B infection.

2. Not doing some shots at all

The pediatricians interviewed for this article were unanimous on this point: Not all diseases are created equal. Some diseases for which children are vaccinated are easier to catch than others, and some are more deadly.

For example, Petters-Armitage told her doctor she wasn't as worried about chicken pox or rotavirus as she was about diseases like polio and pertussis. Even though she says he disagreed with her, he abided by her wishes and didn't give her second and third children vaccinations for chicken pox and rotavirus.

The pediatricians interviewed for this article advise parents that if they're concerned, they should sit down and discuss with their pediatricians the severity of each disease before proceeding with vaccinations.

3. Checking for 'titers' before giving booster shots


For many vaccines, such as chicken pox, children receive boosters to "boost" the immunity received from a previous shot. Some children, however, might not need the booster because they had an adequate immune response to the first shot.

Pediatricians sometimes will do a blood test to check a child's titers. "Checking titers" refers to measuring the amount of antibodies in the blood, an indication of whether the person is immune to a certain disease. Checking titers isn't routine and sometimes is not covered by insurance.

"If you came to me and said you wanted to check titers, and you'll pay for it, would I do that for you? I would," said Dr. Laura Jana, a spokeswoman for the American Academy of Pediatrics.

4. Spreading the vaccines out over a longer period of time


This is the hallmark of the Sears Schedule, an alternative vaccine schedule developed by pediatrician Dr. Robert Sears.

Sears' patients bring their babies in for shots seven times between the ages of 2 to 9 months, never receiving more than two shots at each visit.

Under the CDC schedule, children come in three times during that age range, receiving sometimes five shots at one visit.

5. Splitting up combined shots


Several vaccinations are combined into one shot. For example, measles, mumps and rubella are put together into one injection called MMR, and diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis are put together into one shot called DTaP.

MMR is available as three injections, but most doctors don't have them. If you want to separate out these shots, you may have to get a prescription and find a pharmacy that will order them for you and then give them to the doctor for injection.

Some doctors do offer the shots separately. Sears gives measles, mumps and rubella shots separately and at three different ages. Lavin said he's received so many requests to separate out the MMR, he's ordered the separate shots.

Pertussis is not available separately, so even doctors like Sears, who offer an alternative schedule, give the DTaP shot.

The pediatricians we talked to said the key is to talk to your doctor about whether an alternative schedule is best.

"It's a talk. It's a whole appointment," Traver said. "Call the receptionist and say you'd like to make an appointment with the doctor to discuss immunizations."

Another consideration: what's best for your child. For example, in the case of Hannah Poling, the federal government found that vaccines she received as a toddler "significantly aggravated" an underlying illness that predisposed her to symptoms of autism. The "vaccine court" ordered that her family be compensated financially.

It's not entirely clear what family history would put your child at risk for vaccine problems, but Frances Page Glascoe, a professor of pediatrics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, says parents should look back at least ask the question.

"I would look at Mom, Dad, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins who had developmental disabilities, including language disorders and autism spectrum disorder," she said. If parents find such a family history, "that would cause me to discuss an alternative vaccination schedule."
advertisement

Jon Poling, Hannah's father, says it's clear to him now that he should have been more wary.

"We have autoimmune disorders on both sides of the family, and Hannah had multiple febrile infections with ear infections and horrible trouble with eczema," he said. "All of those are red flags that a child is at risk."

Vaccine Nation - Director's Cut (Gary Null)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Harold E Buttram, M.D.
- "Among the many adversities and difficulties facing the American family today, there is a relatively new and growing hazard in which a parent or caretaker may be falsely accused of murdering or injuring an infant by the shaken baby syndrome, when the true cause of death of injury arises from other sources. Very tragically, child abuse does occur and deserves appropriate punishment. However, it is equally tragic when a family, already grieving from the death of their infant, finds a father or mother unjustly accused, convicted, and imprisoned for murder of the infant, a murder of which he or she is innocent. I know of an attorney, an anesthesiologist, a Mormon mother, an Amish mother, and others accused and/or imprisoned (many believe falsely) on charges of injuring or murdering an infant by SBS. It could happen to anyone regardless of race, sex, educational, financial, or social status. It has happened and is happening to more than a few. Child abuse laws have given rise to many accusations of "Shaken Baby Syndrome," which has become a popular diagnosis to explain infant deaths, and even for living infants who are brought to an emergency room following a fall. Much is made of the finding of pinpoint petechial hemorrhages in the retina at the back of the eye, but the existence and extent of such hemorrhages are dependent on the capillary strength or fragility, the strength or weakness of the smallest blood vessels, which can be affected by many different conditions. In fact, an infant can die with extensive retinal hemorrhages, a blood clot under the capsule of the brain, extensive bruises, broken bones and sores that will not heal, due to Barlow's disease, without having been subjected to anything but the tenderest of loving care."
__________________
SOT- your in my debt
AMEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
SOT Administrator
 
AMEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 345T C045t
Posts: 32,079
AMEX is on a distinguished road
Continued....

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=79430
Serious Bowel Problems Reported in 28 U.S. Babies After Getting RotaTeq Vaccine

Feb. 13, 2007 -- The FDA today announced that 28 U.S. babies reportedly developed a potentially deadly bowel problem after getting the RotaTeq vaccine.

The babies developed intussusception, a serious and potentially life-threatening condition in which the intestine gets blocked or twisted.

Sixteen of the 28 babies required hospitalization and surgery. The other 12 needed enemas to reduce the intussusception. None died.

RotaTeq targets rotavirus, a leading cause of kids' diarrhea. The vaccine, approved by the FDA last year, is on the CDC's 2007 recommended child immunization schedule. It's given in three doses when babies are 2 to 6 months old.

It's not known whether RotaTeq caused the babies' intussusception. The number of reported cases is in line with expectations, says the FDA.

However, a different rotavirus vaccine, called RotaShield, was withdrawn from the market in 1999 after a rise in intussusception was noted after its use.

RotaTeq's label has been updated to reflect the intusssusception reports. But the vaccine's "dosage and administration schedule remains unchanged," says the FDA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welcome to the Yurko Project
Shaken Baby Syndrome/Vaccines/Yurko Project
Imprisoned for life (over six years so far) for shaken baby syndrome (SBS), Alan Yurko is now supported by an armada of medical experts and vaccine safety advocates who agree that his infant son was killed by an adverse reaction to vaccination and by subsequent iatrogenic complications in the hospital.
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080727145200AAA0kka
What baby vaccines are considered "dangerous" and why?
Okay, I'm totally freaked and didn't know you were "allowed" to not have your kid vaccinated. Do you know which vaccines are considered dangerous and if so why? And, our little girl is 9 months old and has already had 3 sessions of shots for DTP, HiB, Polio, Hep B, PCV, and RV. Any info anyone knows is great. Thank you!



Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
There are many toxins in all vaccines.

The one most people are concerned about is the MMR (usually given between 12-15 months) It may be connected to Autism somehow.

But all vaccines have ingredients in them, you'd never want to give your child otherwise. Aluminum, Formaldahyde, Aborted Fetus Cells, Monkey Cell, Paint thinner.. .The list goes on and on...

You do not HAVE to give your child any vaccines. They are supposedly "required" to enter school/daycare, but you can sign a waiver (very easy to do actually!) to enter public schools. Private schools can deny your child entrance. That's it. Doctors/Insurance/CPS cannot make you vaccinate.

I did a lot of research, and if you read the statistics.. Serious side effects occur more often because of vaccines, than serious effects these diseases...

Good Luck with your research! ~

Quote:
Originally Posted by After removed mercury from baby vaccines, why more kids still become autistic?
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-4124

Vaccines. Vaccines. Vaccines. Vaccines still the cause to trigger and worsen 1 of every 150 new borns' autism. Why?
CNN, please explore the three major problems in our baby vaccines--3-in-1 MMR shot. (Measles, Mumps, Rubella).
Problem 1--Mercury--neruontoxicine.
Problem 2--Are these three live virus really safe for some of new borns who have weaker immune system that can't break down these live virus on their own? ( later research found that these live virus from MMR still exiting in these children's brains who are autistic. But children who are not autistic do not contain any of these live virus from MMR when they grow older) These live-virus still remain in some of these autistic children's system and mess up their motablism, immune system confused ( T cells disfunction) and more damamge.
Problem 3 --- why is in the world rushing to give a new baby three vital virus shot at once at the same doctor visit? Schedule of Vaccines worsen autism related disorder and disease. How can a tiny new baby take so much vital live virus in 10 minutes at doctors visit?
Before the 3-in-1 shot invented before 1988, we have never seen huge leap of numbers of autism cases, that was 1 of 10,000 new borns turned autistic, After 1988, 3-in-1 shot released to the market, autism cases numbers jumped to 1 of 750, now it is 1of 150 reaches to epdemic level.
CNN reporters, please dig out more conspiracy on MMR vaccines not just mercury, also is it really safe to have three vital live-virus jampped to a young baby's body? And why CDC, FDA made the decision to release and approve such a 3-in-1 baby vaccines to public in the first place? And why CDC and Department of Health have received epidemic level of autims since 1988 have not done anything to stop the increased numbers? Why did Ili Lily marketing 3-in-1 shots so aggressively???
__________________
SOT- your in my debt
AMEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:21 AM   #3 (permalink)
SOT Administrator
 
Cr@xheadMcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 29,356
Cr@xheadMcgee will become famous soon enough
Interesting. Can we digg it.
__________________
SOT - WHO TOLD YOU ABOUT THIS!!
Cr@xheadMcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
SOT Post Whore
 
el_jefe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BFE Arizona
Posts: 16,555
el_jefe will become famous soon enough
Good stuff, for people who spawn broods. Also, you should look at some of the nasty side effects from epidurals.
__________________
SOT- Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
el_jefe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:34 AM   #5 (permalink)
SOT Administrator
 
AMEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 345T C045t
Posts: 32,079
AMEX is on a distinguished road
the google video is an hour and 30 mins but its probably one of the most important videos a parent can watch
__________________
SOT- your in my debt
AMEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 12:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
SOT Moderator
 
slow4dr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,153
slow4dr is on a distinguished road
I knew the risks of vaccinating my little guy but I did it anyway.
__________________
SOT - Where slavery is still legal
slow4dr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 12:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mayor of Lville
 
Vertabreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The phone booth across the street
Posts: 14,582
Vertabreaker is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_jefe View Post
Good stuff, for people who spawn broods. Also, you should look at some of the nasty side effects from epidurals.
Epidurals can suck my ass. I had one for my knee surgery. Giant needle in your spine =

I know it's different with someone who's preggo. Just wanted to say they suck
__________________
Vertabreaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 01:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Masshole
 
static3d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hollywood, MA
Posts: 1,027
static3d is on a distinguished road
thanks for posting this good info
static3d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 02:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
SOT Administrator
 
AMEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 345T C045t
Posts: 32,079
AMEX is on a distinguished road
Alliance for Human Research Protection - About the Alliance for Human Research Protection

Quote:
Merck Baby Vaccines Not Pure - LAT/ FDA Advisory-Crestor / Zyprexa Lawsuit charges Lilly concealed Diabetes risk

Fri, 11 Mar 2005

The FDA's failure to carry out its watchdog responsibility to protect the public from unsafe drugs, has encouraged the pharmaceutical industry to conceal the risks and deceive the public. Like the tobacco industry, and gun manufacturers, drug manufacturers have been cashing in by marketing products they know pose serious, life-threatening health hazards. Since 1990 fourteen drugs have been withdrawn from the US market because they were unsafe-but not before they killed. See: The best medicine? | Economist.com

Neurological harm from mercury-laced vaccines:

On February 8, The Los Angeles Times disclosed the content of a leaked memo from 1991, written by a former Merck scientist who calculated that 6-month-old children who received their shots on schedule could receive a mercury dose up to 87 times higher than the guideline for the maximum daily consumption of mercury from fish. See: 91 Merck Memo Warned of Mercury in Baby Vaccines - LAT

In a follow up report, the LAT reports that contrary to a 1999 public announcement by Merck, "Now, Merck's infant vaccine line is free of all preservatives," the company continued to distribute mercury laced vaccines as late as 2002.

Merck's reputation suffered irreparable damage when it was revealed that Merck failed to dislcose the risk of heart attacks and strokes linked to the painkiller, Vioxx. The revelations about the baby vaccines show another instance of deceptive marketing: Congressman Dave Weldon, a Florida Republican and a physician, said what Merck did was "misleading." "You had people literally into 2002 getting shots with mercury, having been told it was all taken out in 1999."

Since immunizations are mandatory, the Center for Disease Control and the FDA bear even greater responsibility for ensuring that babies are protected from defective vaccines or vaccines containing hazardous substances.

More than 4,200 claims have been filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by parents alleging that their children suffered autism or other neurological disorders from mercury in their shots. To shield Eli Lilly from liability in lawsuits for damage from its vaccines containing mercury, the White House had slipped into the Homeland Security Law a clause giving Lilly immunity. That clause, however, was repealed by Congress. See: Homeland Security bill_ - Pharma Immunity - WP

The cholesterol reducing statin, Crestor, is linked to severe, life-threatening muscle damage: The Washington Post reports that after much criticism, the FDA has issued an advisory warning about the risks posed by the statin, Crestor. But Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, petitioned the FDA in October to ban Crestor-because, he said, since the drug came on the market (September 2003) it has been linked to 117 cases of rhabdomyolysis and 41 cases of kidney failure -- which he said are higher totals than for other statins on the market.

Wolfe called FDA action "yet another example of the agency's dangerous cowardice in failing to adequately protect people in this country from uniquely dangerous prescription drugs." Germany, Norway and Spain, have not approved Crestor because of these safety concerns.

Zyprexa (olanzapine) is linked to Hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus: Eli Lilly faces numerous lawsuits involving its best selling drug, Zyprexa (olanzapine), which was approved by the FDA in 1996 for the treatment of schizophrenia, and in 2000 for short term treatment of bi-polar (manic-depressive) disorder. Zyprexa is the focus of several class action lawsuits in the US and Canada, by plaintiffs who allege they have contracted diabetes as a result of taking the drug. See: Legal News Watch Zyprexa Lawsuits to be Unified in New York

Olanzapine produced serious adverse side effects in 22% of adult patients with schizophrenia in whom it was tested in clinical trials. Among the reported severe adverse effects of the drug were cardiovascular complications (10% to 15%); acute weight gain (50%); Parkinson-like motor impairment (11.7%); and unbearable restlessness (akathisia) (7.3%). Whitaker & Kong (1998) prize winning series, Doing Harm, Boston Globe, Nov 15-18.

By 2001, FDA's MedWatch has received at least 384 reports of diabetes in patients prescribed Zyprexa. Those reports represent 3% to 10% of actual adverse drug events. A review of those MedWatch reports by medical officers from FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Review and Duke University found a causal association between Zyprexa and diabetes, including in adolescents--a condition that is rare in adolescents. See: Koller, E., Malozowski S, Doraiswamy PM. 2001. Letter. Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs and Hyperglycemia in Adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 286 No. 20, November 28, 2001. JAMA -- File Not Found .

The Japanese Ministry of Health issued a safety alert about the drug's links to diabetes in 2002: in Japan the drug is contraindicated in patients with diabetes or a history of diabetes. But the FDA allowed the drug to be marketed without an explicit warning about the nature of the diabetes-Zyprexa risk until 2004:

" Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus-- Hyperglycemia, in some cases extreme and associated with ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma or death, has been reported in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics including olanzapine."

In pre-marketing clinical trials, the death rate in Zyprexa was higher than in any other neuroleptic drug trial in history. See: Healy, (2002) Randomized controlled trials: Evidence biased psychiatry, online at: Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence Biased Psychiatry ;

Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav
212-595-8974

Merck Misled on Vaccines, Some Say - Los Angeles Times
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES
Merck Misled on Vaccines, Some Say The firm supplied shots containing a mercury compound after saying it had halted its use.
By Myron Levin
March 7, 2005

Drug maker Merck & Co. continued to supply infant vaccine containing a mercury-based preservative for two years after declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

In September 1999, amid rising concern about the risks of mercury in childhood vaccines, Merck announced that the Food and Drug Administration had approved a preservative-free version of its hepatitis B vaccine.
__________________
SOT- your in my debt
AMEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 02:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
SOT Administrator
 
AMEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 345T C045t
Posts: 32,079
AMEX is on a distinguished road
Alliance for Human Research Protection - About the Alliance for Human Research Protection

Quote:
Merck Baby Vaccines Not Pure - LAT/ FDA Advisory-Crestor / Zyprexa Lawsuit charges Lilly concealed Diabetes risk

Fri, 11 Mar 2005

The FDA's failure to carry out its watchdog responsibility to protect the public from unsafe drugs, has encouraged the pharmaceutical industry to conceal the risks and deceive the public. Like the tobacco industry, and gun manufacturers, drug manufacturers have been cashing in by marketing products they know pose serious, life-threatening health hazards. Since 1990 fourteen drugs have been withdrawn from the US market because they were unsafe-but not before they killed. See: The best medicine? | Economist.com

Neurological harm from mercury-laced vaccines:

On February 8, The Los Angeles Times disclosed the content of a leaked memo from 1991, written by a former Merck scientist who calculated that 6-month-old children who received their shots on schedule could receive a mercury dose up to 87 times higher than the guideline for the maximum daily consumption of mercury from fish. See: 91 Merck Memo Warned of Mercury in Baby Vaccines - LAT

In a follow up report, the LAT reports that contrary to a 1999 public announcement by Merck, "Now, Merck's infant vaccine line is free of all preservatives," the company continued to distribute mercury laced vaccines as late as 2002.

Merck's reputation suffered irreparable damage when it was revealed that Merck failed to dislcose the risk of heart attacks and strokes linked to the painkiller, Vioxx. The revelations about the baby vaccines show another instance of deceptive marketing: Congressman Dave Weldon, a Florida Republican and a physician, said what Merck did was "misleading." "You had people literally into 2002 getting shots with mercury, having been told it was all taken out in 1999."

Since immunizations are mandatory, the Center for Disease Control and the FDA bear even greater responsibility for ensuring that babies are protected from defective vaccines or vaccines containing hazardous substances.

More than 4,200 claims have been filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by parents alleging that their children suffered autism or other neurological disorders from mercury in their shots. To shield Eli Lilly from liability in lawsuits for damage from its vaccines containing mercury, the White House had slipped into the Homeland Security Law a clause giving Lilly immunity. That clause, however, was repealed by Congress. See: Homeland Security bill_ - Pharma Immunity - WP

The cholesterol reducing statin, Crestor, is linked to severe, life-threatening muscle damage: The Washington Post reports that after much criticism, the FDA has issued an advisory warning about the risks posed by the statin, Crestor. But Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, petitioned the FDA in October to ban Crestor-because, he said, since the drug came on the market (September 2003) it has been linked to 117 cases of rhabdomyolysis and 41 cases of kidney failure -- which he said are higher totals than for other statins on the market.

Wolfe called FDA action "yet another example of the agency's dangerous cowardice in failing to adequately protect people in this country from uniquely dangerous prescription drugs." Germany, Norway and Spain, have not approved Crestor because of these safety concerns.

Zyprexa (olanzapine) is linked to Hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus: Eli Lilly faces numerous lawsuits involving its best selling drug, Zyprexa (olanzapine), which was approved by the FDA in 1996 for the treatment of schizophrenia, and in 2000 for short term treatment of bi-polar (manic-depressive) disorder. Zyprexa is the focus of several class action lawsuits in the US and Canada, by plaintiffs who allege they have contracted diabetes as a result of taking the drug. See: Legal News Watch Zyprexa Lawsuits to be Unified in New York

Olanzapine produced serious adverse side effects in 22% of adult patients with schizophrenia in whom it was tested in clinical trials. Among the reported severe adverse effects of the drug were cardiovascular complications (10% to 15%); acute weight gain (50%); Parkinson-like motor impairment (11.7%); and unbearable restlessness (akathisia) (7.3%). Whitaker & Kong (1998) prize winning series, Doing Harm, Boston Globe, Nov 15-18.

By 2001, FDA's MedWatch has received at least 384 reports of diabetes in patients prescribed Zyprexa. Those reports represent 3% to 10% of actual adverse drug events. A review of those MedWatch reports by medical officers from FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Review and Duke University found a causal association between Zyprexa and diabetes, including in adolescents--a condition that is rare in adolescents. See: Koller, E., Malozowski S, Doraiswamy PM. 2001. Letter. Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs and Hyperglycemia in Adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 286 No. 20, November 28, 2001. JAMA -- File Not Found .

The Japanese Ministry of Health issued a safety alert about the drug's links to diabetes in 2002: in Japan the drug is contraindicated in patients with diabetes or a history of diabetes. But the FDA allowed the drug to be marketed without an explicit warning about the nature of the diabetes-Zyprexa risk until 2004:

" Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus-- Hyperglycemia, in some cases extreme and associated with ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma or death, has been reported in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics including olanzapine."

In pre-marketing clinical trials, the death rate in Zyprexa was higher than in any other neuroleptic drug trial in history. See: Healy, (2002) Randomized controlled trials: Evidence biased psychiatry, online at: Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence Biased Psychiatry ;

Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav
212-595-8974

Merck Misled on Vaccines, Some Say - Los Angeles Times
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES
Merck Misled on Vaccines, Some Say The firm supplied shots containing a mercury compound after saying it had halted its use.
By Myron Levin
March 7, 2005

Drug maker Merck & Co. continued to supply infant vaccine containing a mercury-based preservative for two years after declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

In September 1999, amid rising concern about the risks of mercury in childhood vaccines, Merck announced that the Food and Drug Administration had approved a preservative-free version of its hepatitis B vaccine.
__________________
SOT- your in my debt
AMEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
baby, epidemic, vaccines

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.sotsyndicate.com/news-current-events/20184-baby-vaccines-new-epidemic-what-you-need-know.html
Posted By For Type Date
Digg - Baby Vaccines, the new epidemic. What you need to know. This thread Refback 08-19-2008 06:59 PM
Digg - Baby Vaccines, the new epidemic. What you need to know. This thread Refback 08-12-2008 12:43 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

   

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0